Why Should I Care about Mutable vs. Immutable Types

.NET, Coding Tips 3 Minutes

In C#, classes and objects can be categorized as mutable or immutable based on whether their state can be changed after they are created. Understanding the distinction between mutable and immutable types is crucial for designing robust, maintainable, and performant applications.

Mutable Classes

Mutable classes are those whose state or data can be modified after they are instantiated. For example, if a class has properties that can be changed through setters or methods, it is considered mutable. This is very familiar coding practice in object-oriented programming style.

Example of a Mutable Class:
public class Person
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public int Age { get; set; }
}

// Usage
var person = new Person { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 };
person.Age = 31; // Mutating the state
Benefits of Mutable Classes:
  • Flexibility: Easy to modify objects as needed without creating new instances.
  • Familiarity: Common and familiar pattern, especially in imperative programming.
  • Performance: Lower memory allocation since objects can be modified in place.
Disadvantages of Mutable Classes:
  • Thread Safety: Not inherently thread-safe, which can lead to race conditions and bugs in multi-threaded environments.
  • Side Effects: Changing the state of mutable objects can introduce unintended side effects, making code harder to reason about and maintain.
  • Increased Complexity: Requires additional management of object state, particularly when objects are shared across different parts of an application.

Immutable Classes

Immutable classes, on the other hand, are those whose state cannot be changed once they are created. All data is set at the time of construction, and no setter methods or other mechanisms exist to modify the object state after that point. Functions that change the object data return a new instance of the class. This is very common practice in functional programming.

Example of an Immutable Class:
public class Person
{
    public string Name { get; }
    public int Age { get; }

    public Person(string name, int age)
    {
        Name = name;
        Age = age;
    }
}

// Usage
var person = new Person("Alice", 30);
// person.Age = 31; // Compilation error - cannot modify
Benefits of Immutable Classes:
  • Better Thread Safety: Naturally thread-safe since their state cannot change, reducing the need for synchronization.
  • Predictability: Easier to reason about since objects do not change state unexpectedly.
  • Simplified Debugging: Fewer side effects and state changes lead to easier debugging and maintenance.
  • Functional Programming Compatibility: Aligns with functional programming paradigms, which emphasize immutability and pure functions.
Disadvantages of Immutable Classes:
  • Memory Overhead: May lead to higher memory usage and garbage collection overhead since new instances are created instead of modifying existing ones.
  • Performance: Creating new objects instead of modifying existing ones can be slower, particularly in performance-critical sections of code.
  • Inconvenience: Working with immutable types can sometimes be less convenient, requiring extra steps to produce modified versions of objects.

How Record Types in C# Simplify Immutability

With the introduction of record types in C# 9, creating immutable objects has become more straightforward and concise. Record types are designed for immutability by default and provide a concise syntax for defining immutable data models.

Example of a Record Type:

public record Person(string Name, int Age);

This single line of code defines an immutable Person record with two properties, Name and Age. By default, all properties in a record type are init-only, meaning they can only be set during object initialization.

Benefits of Record Types:

  • Conciseness: Significantly reduces boilerplate code needed for defining immutable objects.
  • Built-in Features: Automatically provides value-based equality, ToString(), and with expressions for creating modified copies.
  • Immutability by Default: Encourages immutability, promoting safer and more predictable code.

Using Records with the with Expression:

var person = new Person("Alice", 30);
var olderPerson = person with { Age = 31 }; // Creates a new instance with modified age

Choosing Between Mutable and Immutable Types

When deciding whether to use mutable or immutable types in your application, consider the following:

  • Use Immutable Types When:
    • You need thread safety without locking.
    • You want to minimize side effects and improve code predictability.
    • You are working with functional programming paradigms or value-based equality.
  • Use Mutable Types When:
    • You need to frequently update object state in place for performance reasons.
    • You are working in a context where state changes are central, such as UI state management.
    • You prefer the flexibility and familiarity of modifying objects directly.

Conclusion

Understanding the trade-offs between mutable and immutable types, and when to use which option is crucial in C#. The introduction of record types in C# makes it easier to adopt immutability, providing a powerful tool for designing safer and more reliable applications. Ultimately, the choice between mutable and immutable should be driven by the specific needs of your application, the programming style used on your team, and the benefits you wish to achieve.

Published

Leave a comment